There is a huge misconception when talking
about Romanticism and, to be honest I was part of big group of people that when
thinking about Romanticism immediately used to related this concept to “Love”
or “Feelings between people”. The truth is that there is a higher complexity in
the word Romanticism, reaching a definition that includes a unique perspective
like the following: “To be Romantic is to react to previous generations, to
react against artificiality, to react against a Neo-Classical model. To be
Romantic is to get in contact with Nature.”
The Romantic Age is the result of several reactions
against History, Religion, Economy, Politics, Social issues, etc; it changes
the established way of see things in life. The “Enlightenment” is one social
consequence that appeared because of the Industrial Revolution and affected
economy as well as people’s lives: injustice, poverty, emigration, lack of
prosperity, those were some of the factors that made people think and want a
new life but also made people create new ideas that influenced the change.
Within the change, we can appreciate the new
role of Nature: the idea of return to the roots and be connected with nature is
present in the Romantic Literature; on the contrary, industry and to be
civilized is a synonym of artificiality. In this way, nature represents
simplicity, originality, transcendentalism, authenticity and goodness.
One of my favorite romantic poems is “Volverán
las oscuras golondrinas” written by Gustavo Adolfo Bécquer.
RIMA LIII
Volverán las oscuras golondrinas
en tu balcón sus nidos a colgar,
y otra vez con el ala a sus cristales
jugando llamarán.
Pero aquellas que el vuelo refrenaban
aquellas que aprendieron nuestros nombres...
¡esas... no volverán!.
Volverán las tupidas madreselvas
de tu jardín las tapias a escalar,
y otra vez a la tarde aún más hermosas
sus flores se abrirán.
Pero aquellas, cuajadas de rocío
cuyas gotas mirábamos temblar
y caer como lágrimas del día...
¡esas... no volverán!
Volverán del amor en tus oídos
las palabras ardientes a sonar;
tu corazón de su profundo sueño
tal vez despertará.
Pero mudo y absorto y de rodillas
como se adora a Dios ante su altar,
como yo te he querido...; desengáñate,
¡así... no te querrán!
Although it is a poem of the Late Romanticism,
we can identify all the main Romantic features and also it reflects the
characteristics of the Romantic Poet: Solitary, Passion, Imagination, Wild
Nature, and Rebellion. Here, we can
think of Romanticism as the wrong idea of love but even though the writer shows
the desolation caused in his heart by a love that has abandon him, it can also
be identified the idealization of the lover and the feelings they had, until
the point that the perfect love has made nature part of the relation. Furthermore
divinity and religion are present to emphasize that he knows the reality: he
can’t bring back the days of happiness and true love; this it can be noticed
through the entire poem. It is important to mention that nature also transcends
as the time passes, which is why the honeysuckles grow again and the swallows
return.
Romantic poets wanted to break the
superficiality and exaggeration of the modern concepts of romance and love,
they look for simplicity and they use simple but meaningful words showing the
beauty of life and nature.
Romanticism as the myth of Prometheus is the
change in life’s vision: Prometheus are all the great men and women that
thought about a humankind in contact with nature, simplicity, spirituality, etc.
that wanted to make a change, that wanted to illuminate other people’s mind
giving them the fire that will help to transmit the knowledge and make people
unique individuals: fire will give them the same power Gods used to have, it
can be interpreted as the power and capacity that businessmen and landowners
had.
Romanticism is not romantic, but can romantic love be an expression of Romanticism? What do you think?
References:
Baase, S. (n.d.). Prometheus myth: A Gift of Fire. Retrieved August 24, 2014, from https://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/giftfire/prometheus.html
Brians, P. (2004). Romanticism. Retrieved August 24, 2014, from http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/hum_303/romanticism.html
Graves, R. (1960). The greek myths. Retrieved August 24, 2014, from http://www.24grammata.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Robert-Graves-The-Greek-Myths-24grammata.com_.pdf
Jehle, F. (2000). Volveran las oscuras golondrinas, por Gustavo Adolfo Becquer. Retrieved August 23, 2014, from http://users.ipfw.edu/jehle/poesia/volveran.htm
It's an interesting question. Well, given all the details that you've already mentioned, I believe that romantic love it is indeed an expression of Romanticism. I hold this because humans are not just body or mind or spirit/soul; we are a combination of these aspects that coexists within us. Since romantic love is an expression of feelings - which can be considered an aspect of the soul - and we cannot detach from them without breaking the concept of unity and naturalness, they should be considered as a "reaction against artificiality" as you quoted. Romantic love is filled with passion, and that passion can be shown towards a person or even towards an ideal or conviction. I think that is the reason why we tend to relate romanticism with couple's love, because of the passion and drive that guides Romantic ideals as well as the passion that accompanies feelings of the ones that are in love.
ResponderEliminarCristina,
ResponderEliminarInteresting topic and I have to confess that I also had the very same confusion about Romanticism and Love. Regarding your question, I agree with the statement of Romanticism is not romantic, since it involves more concepts, such as death, life, nature, truth, etc. Those are sources of inspiration for Romantic poets such as Whitman or Keats. Another topic that was covered by Romantic poets was romantic love. Let's remember La Belle Dame Sans Merci or Bright Star. The idea behind these topics is what is natural is good. As you said before, Romanticism was a reaction against what was fake, unnatural, and artificial and since love is something natural, it was a great topic for them.
I reckon most of us must have had the same confussion due to what we've seen in media.
ResponderEliminarRegarding your question of whether can romantic love be an expression of romanticism, I would answer yes, because, as Constanza said, romanticism is a reaction against the superficiality that was part of a certain time and we could say that romantic love follows the ideas of romanticism as a more natural way of expressing one's feelings, putting aside any kind of fake representation.