Animal Farm is a novel written by George Orwell that was
published in 1945. In a similar way as it happens in 1984, Orwell shows us in this novel some of the negative features
of totalitarian regimes --though in a different way than he does in the novel
that we covered in class--.
First of
all, unlike what happens in 1984, the
characters in Animal Farm actually
organize themselves to take over the totalitarian regime they were into, which –originally—was
imposed by humans. This main difference, taking place at the beginning of the
novel, somehow gives room to the possibility that though these two novels
Orwell gives us the chance to ponder two possible answers to a totalitarian
system.
On the one
hand, in 1984, we are introduced to Winston, who is unable to oppose his
system because of his isolation of any socio-political power that could back
him up. On the other hand, in Animal Farm,
this social organization is present –originally
through the idealistic Major, then from Snowball and finally through Napoleon—however,
it is this organization which –as the story moves forward—actually creates a
new totalitarian system that is at least as bad as the one previously oppressed
their society: up to the point that the pigs even start dressing and acting
like humans, while imposing themselves as superiors to the other animals in the
farm.
“All
animals are equals!” was a key principle mentioned by the wise pig Major at the
very beginning of the novel; however,--as the story kept moving—it steadily changed
into “All animals are equals... but some animals are more equal than others”
after Napoleon became the leader of the farm. I strongly believe that it is at
this point when we can strongly make a connection between Animal Farm and 1984.
What would
have happened if Winston had been able to gather enough people to effectively oppose
and take over the system that oppressed him? I believe that Orwell gives a
potential answer to this question in Animal
Farm. What would have happened if
only one or two pigs would have been the only ones against the totalitarian
system they were into because of the humans at the beginning of the story? I
believe Orwell gives us a potential answer to this question in 1984.
All in all,
I believe that –through these two novels-- George Orwell wants us to realize
that absolute power could corrupt even the best of us. Additionally, I consider
that he also wants to share the view that humanity is inherently good –despite the
terrible circumstances we could be into—and that despite society gradually
corrupts us, there will always be at least one character –or a few of them--
who will be aware of a higher truth than the one an imposing system will try to
show all of us every day.
How do you
see the connection between these two novels? Do you know any other examples in
fiction in which some characters have to oppose an oppressing regime like in
these 2 Orwell’s novels?
Reference
Orwell, George. "Animal Farm (1945)." CLASSIC (2009): 97.
Reference
Orwell, George. "Animal Farm (1945)." CLASSIC (2009): 97.
When I read the first part of the novel in high school, I did not realize about the strong criticism against political abuse and the over control of the governments hidden behind a pig and the rest of the animals in the farm. Now, after we analyzed 1984 in class I immediately remembered this book and the similarities that has in relation to 1984; also I thought about the possibility of Winston being free and not absorbed by the system, which is the happy ending we as readers commonly expect. Regarding your question “What would have happened if Winston had been able to gather enough people to effectively oppose and take over the system that oppressed him?”, I think that if Winston had been able to oppose and take over the system in order to free his society, there would not be easy and the peace he so much wanted would not last that much, mainly because the possibility of the existence of people corrupted enough to try to bring back the fascism and over control of the government. Finally, regarding the connection of both novels, I believe that they reflect in one way or another the consequences of people’s acts made without thinking, reaching a point in which they create and perform the same as the elements they hated so much; that is why for example the pigs stablish a “government” which ends being equally or even worst to the one they hated.
ResponderEliminar